This is just ridiculous and is the product of a total misunderstanding of metagenomics, etiology, and the admission by 209 governments and institutions that they have no sample of a Scov-2 virus particle taken from a human host. The bottom line is that the PCR used for Scov-2 is primed with in silico and not real primers. PCR is a simple matching principle; it cannot find what it does not have — and the one thing that it does not have is any genetic code that has ever been shown to match a virus or cause disease.
Additionally, many, many other people besides Drs. Cowan and Kaufman have done independent research (meaning doctoral level) on this issue, and they include Drs. Sam and Mark Bailey (who have ferreted out the history of viruses back to the first hour), Dr. Kevin Corbett, filmmaker Michael Wallach, and two stars of independent journalism, Christine Massey and Mike Stone.
As early as 2006 and even before, the PCR was known to produce 100% false positives resulting in three different non-existent "pandemics." The PCR cannot measure viral load, find virus or test for infection, and that is the ONLY proof that "there is a virus spreading." It was never about symptoms or the few people who may have had them; it's always been about the false "case count" manufactured by the PCR.
The problem is not about Kaufman or Cowan defending their allegedly terrible theory. It is about the lack of understanding of the whole problem of virology and its false conflation with metagenomics.
Bradford-Hill criterion is not for showing that a thing (i.e. "SARS-COV-2" particle) exists. You have to already know that a potential cause exists and be able to measure/detect it in order to apply Bradford-Hill. Alleged "viruses" like "SARS-COV-2" on the other hand have never even been shown to exist, let alone cause anything. "It" hasn't been sequenced. Virologists simply ASSEMBLE meaningless, fraudulent, strictly in silico sequences on computers, from zillions of smaller sequences of unknown provenance, and label them "genomes". You've been duped if you're buying into Hammond's nonsense. Read the Methods sections of the papers for yourself.
And no one is required to answer any of your questions in order to refute the virus hypothesis. The onus is on those who make the claim that something exists to prove it. Nevertheless, if you had studied the work of the great men you mentioned above you would not be nearly so confused.
My God you're confused. "The theory advanced by Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman that viruses don’t exist..." We don't have a theory, we are refuting a hypothesis that has never even been tested with valid controlled experiments. Virologists don't even get to the stage of finding and purifying an alleged virus from the bodily fluid/tissue of an alleged "host" to use as an independent variable in any controlled experiment (JLW: try telling me again that I don't understand what an independent variable is? lol).
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (211 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions have no record of any “virus” having been found in a host and isolated/purified. Because virology isn’t a science:
My God you're confused. "The theory advanced by Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman that viruses don’t exist..." We don't have a theory, we are refuting a hypothesis that has never even been tested with valid controlled experiments. Virologists don't even get to the stage of finding and purifying an alleged virus from the bodily fluid/tissue of an alleged "host" to use as an independent variable in any controlled experiment (JLW: try telling me again that I don't understand what an independent variable is? lol).
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (211 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions have no record of any “virus” having been found in a host and isolated/purified. Because virology isn’t a science:
"If we maintain silence, I think the doubts about the no-virus hypothesis would naturally fall by the wayside."
Rather, we should point virus skeptics to a data source that provides compelling arguments against the no-virus hypothesis. Failure to engage is unethical as it is censorship by degree.
but why not let them debate it? there should be rigorous debate about this topic. I can see with all your questions: ...."if there is no virus?" .... that you are not fully understanding what they are arguing. It is very deep, admittedly. It deserves to be debated.
I'm starting to understand that the new definition of misinformation is Truth. Thank you for this wonderful learning article. The links will keep me busy all day.
If you watch how Christine Massey works, you see that she asks for science, which you will then provide, then replies with rhetoric that the science you provided is "fake", showing that she's unethical, which you ought then point out. Then Massey lies and says that you didn't provide any science.
Massey is a fraud who is out to extract fools from their $$$. It's worth engaging her to point this out. Perhaps her followers will see that she is unethical and come to their senses.
I want to add the historical element to the pathogen theory. They say that when Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1492 he brought sailors with mouths full of pathogens, and rotting teeth that had resulted from 700 years of fighting the Spanish re-conquista. They say that the sailors just breathing on the native population was enough to make them drop dead. Europe had gone through centuries of disease experience, centuries of the plague. The plague (the Black Death) that decimated the population of Europe in the 14th century (1350?) was carried by fleas on burrowing rodents when the trade routes moved north, away from the desert. Before the plague arrived, Europeans lived in profoundly unsanitary conditions with sewer running in the streets, rats everywhere, and no clean water, but the people adapted to it apparently because there was a population boom. The plague hit city after city and killed in a matter of days with the victims developing black pustules in their lymph nodes. It wasn't just Europe. The slave armies of Cairo were almost completely wiped out in their barracks. Some places, though, were not hit and the living conditions were the same as places that were. If there was no pathogen, no plague, what killed all those people? If there is no pathogens then what does disease experience mean? The sailors had disease experience and were much less healthy than the natives who had perfect teeth, no rotting And yet the sailors didn't die and the healthy people did. Eliminate the simplest explanation and it is very confusing.
Wasn't there someone on Twitter, offering large sums to whomever would present him with an isolate; but no one came forward? That must have been in 2020 or 2021. What is the current status of that challenge? I totally endorse the last 3 paras of the above article, yet I find it irritating if no isolate was actually presented to skeptics.
In order to get the "live" attenuated virus particles that are used in some vaccines, they have to come from somewhere. They get them from allowing living cells to make more copies of them. So, they start with a little and end up with a lot of these electron microscope visible particles. Just saying. Some will say the visible particles are just cellular debris from preparing the stuff to look at it under the microscope. Others say they are distinct separate replicated particles. We'll never know for sure because we can't watch it happen.
What if the FizerNazis come to your village, dose you with X-rays, poison you with warfarin, and with E. coli, mycoplasmas, and spirochetes - all harboring sequences for 'Ebola' - so as to create the false positive serology and PCR's for another fake 'Ebola' outbreak?
You gonna take Vit K and antibiotics or the I.V. Remdesivir kidney poison?
This vrilogy death cult stuff is all Lysenko pseudoscience. The psychopaths at the top of the food chain know about all kinds of 'Emerging Pathogens' trickery you never imagined. Open your mind.
Why do suppose they still rely on these bizarre tissue culture methods for the 'Isolation of Virus' fakery? To trick the stupid technicians.
Whatever they're playing around with in the lab all dressed-up in moon suits, they're not finding any 'novel viruses'.
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA
Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 464-468, February 1974
Interaction of Mycoplasmas with Cell Cultures, as Visualized by
Electron Microscopy
(scanning electron microscope/cell-surface replicas/autoradiography)
SUSAN BROWN, MARLYN TEPLITZ, AND JEAN-PAUL REVEL
Division of Biology, Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif. 91109
Communicated by Jerome Vinograd, October 15, 1973
Vrilogy is a death cult. Beware! Individuals who question the dogma tend to die under mysterious circumstances.
Perhaps you should read Karen Kingston's substack for answers to the proposed questions. We have 5G and aerial spraying at play too. Important to consider environmental variables.
> The theory advanced by Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman that viruses don’t exist
"We actually are not presenting a theory. Because a theory would purport to explain natural phenomena. What we are doing is refuting a theory. We haven't made a claim as to the cause of the disease. But there has been a claim made that there is a virus called SARS-CoV-2... and that [this virus causes] a specific disease.
What we are doing is refuting the evidence put forth to satisfy that claim, because it is extremely faulty and perhaps even fraudulent at some level."
-- Dr Andrew Kaufman, Testimony before the German Corona Committee 4 Feb 2022
Girl, one patent doesn't disprove the theory nor the reality. Nor does a 5 min search into Bill
gate's initiative. That's sheer ignorance and naivety. Geoenginnering is a big topic globally. Question what they are spraying then the impact of it. Please consider researching the subject in depth.
This is just ridiculous and is the product of a total misunderstanding of metagenomics, etiology, and the admission by 209 governments and institutions that they have no sample of a Scov-2 virus particle taken from a human host. The bottom line is that the PCR used for Scov-2 is primed with in silico and not real primers. PCR is a simple matching principle; it cannot find what it does not have — and the one thing that it does not have is any genetic code that has ever been shown to match a virus or cause disease.
Additionally, many, many other people besides Drs. Cowan and Kaufman have done independent research (meaning doctoral level) on this issue, and they include Drs. Sam and Mark Bailey (who have ferreted out the history of viruses back to the first hour), Dr. Kevin Corbett, filmmaker Michael Wallach, and two stars of independent journalism, Christine Massey and Mike Stone.
As early as 2006 and even before, the PCR was known to produce 100% false positives resulting in three different non-existent "pandemics." The PCR cannot measure viral load, find virus or test for infection, and that is the ONLY proof that "there is a virus spreading." It was never about symptoms or the few people who may have had them; it's always been about the false "case count" manufactured by the PCR.
The problem is not about Kaufman or Cowan defending their allegedly terrible theory. It is about the lack of understanding of the whole problem of virology and its false conflation with metagenomics.
Please see:
https://planetwaves.fm/a-farewell-to-virology-by-dr-mark-bailey/
All of my reporting notes are here:
https://audio.pwfm.tech/documents/covid-chronology-5.1.3.pdf
Bradford-Hill criterion is not for showing that a thing (i.e. "SARS-COV-2" particle) exists. You have to already know that a potential cause exists and be able to measure/detect it in order to apply Bradford-Hill. Alleged "viruses" like "SARS-COV-2" on the other hand have never even been shown to exist, let alone cause anything. "It" hasn't been sequenced. Virologists simply ASSEMBLE meaningless, fraudulent, strictly in silico sequences on computers, from zillions of smaller sequences of unknown provenance, and label them "genomes". You've been duped if you're buying into Hammond's nonsense. Read the Methods sections of the papers for yourself.
And no one is required to answer any of your questions in order to refute the virus hypothesis. The onus is on those who make the claim that something exists to prove it. Nevertheless, if you had studied the work of the great men you mentioned above you would not be nearly so confused.
My God you're confused. "The theory advanced by Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman that viruses don’t exist..." We don't have a theory, we are refuting a hypothesis that has never even been tested with valid controlled experiments. Virologists don't even get to the stage of finding and purifying an alleged virus from the bodily fluid/tissue of an alleged "host" to use as an independent variable in any controlled experiment (JLW: try telling me again that I don't understand what an independent variable is? lol).
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (211 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions have no record of any “virus” having been found in a host and isolated/purified. Because virology isn’t a science:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/
Do virologists perform valid control experiments? Is virology a science?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/
My God you're confused. "The theory advanced by Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman that viruses don’t exist..." We don't have a theory, we are refuting a hypothesis that has never even been tested with valid controlled experiments. Virologists don't even get to the stage of finding and purifying an alleged virus from the bodily fluid/tissue of an alleged "host" to use as an independent variable in any controlled experiment (JLW: try telling me again that I don't understand what an independent variable is? lol).
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (211 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions have no record of any “virus” having been found in a host and isolated/purified. Because virology isn’t a science:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/
Do virologists perform valid control experiments? Is virology a science?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/
"If we maintain silence, I think the doubts about the no-virus hypothesis would naturally fall by the wayside."
Rather, we should point virus skeptics to a data source that provides compelling arguments against the no-virus hypothesis. Failure to engage is unethical as it is censorship by degree.
but why not let them debate it? there should be rigorous debate about this topic. I can see with all your questions: ...."if there is no virus?" .... that you are not fully understanding what they are arguing. It is very deep, admittedly. It deserves to be debated.
I'm starting to understand that the new definition of misinformation is Truth. Thank you for this wonderful learning article. The links will keep me busy all day.
If you watch how Christine Massey works, you see that she asks for science, which you will then provide, then replies with rhetoric that the science you provided is "fake", showing that she's unethical, which you ought then point out. Then Massey lies and says that you didn't provide any science.
Massey is a fraud who is out to extract fools from their $$$. It's worth engaging her to point this out. Perhaps her followers will see that she is unethical and come to their senses.
I want to add the historical element to the pathogen theory. They say that when Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1492 he brought sailors with mouths full of pathogens, and rotting teeth that had resulted from 700 years of fighting the Spanish re-conquista. They say that the sailors just breathing on the native population was enough to make them drop dead. Europe had gone through centuries of disease experience, centuries of the plague. The plague (the Black Death) that decimated the population of Europe in the 14th century (1350?) was carried by fleas on burrowing rodents when the trade routes moved north, away from the desert. Before the plague arrived, Europeans lived in profoundly unsanitary conditions with sewer running in the streets, rats everywhere, and no clean water, but the people adapted to it apparently because there was a population boom. The plague hit city after city and killed in a matter of days with the victims developing black pustules in their lymph nodes. It wasn't just Europe. The slave armies of Cairo were almost completely wiped out in their barracks. Some places, though, were not hit and the living conditions were the same as places that were. If there was no pathogen, no plague, what killed all those people? If there is no pathogens then what does disease experience mean? The sailors had disease experience and were much less healthy than the natives who had perfect teeth, no rotting And yet the sailors didn't die and the healthy people did. Eliminate the simplest explanation and it is very confusing.
Wasn't there someone on Twitter, offering large sums to whomever would present him with an isolate; but no one came forward? That must have been in 2020 or 2021. What is the current status of that challenge? I totally endorse the last 3 paras of the above article, yet I find it irritating if no isolate was actually presented to skeptics.
In order to get the "live" attenuated virus particles that are used in some vaccines, they have to come from somewhere. They get them from allowing living cells to make more copies of them. So, they start with a little and end up with a lot of these electron microscope visible particles. Just saying. Some will say the visible particles are just cellular debris from preparing the stuff to look at it under the microscope. Others say they are distinct separate replicated particles. We'll never know for sure because we can't watch it happen.
What if the FizerNazis come to your village, dose you with X-rays, poison you with warfarin, and with E. coli, mycoplasmas, and spirochetes - all harboring sequences for 'Ebola' - so as to create the false positive serology and PCR's for another fake 'Ebola' outbreak?
You gonna take Vit K and antibiotics or the I.V. Remdesivir kidney poison?
This vrilogy death cult stuff is all Lysenko pseudoscience. The psychopaths at the top of the food chain know about all kinds of 'Emerging Pathogens' trickery you never imagined. Open your mind.
Why do suppose they still rely on these bizarre tissue culture methods for the 'Isolation of Virus' fakery? To trick the stupid technicians.
Whatever they're playing around with in the lab all dressed-up in moon suits, they're not finding any 'novel viruses'.
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA
Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 464-468, February 1974
Interaction of Mycoplasmas with Cell Cultures, as Visualized by
Electron Microscopy
(scanning electron microscope/cell-surface replicas/autoradiography)
SUSAN BROWN, MARLYN TEPLITZ, AND JEAN-PAUL REVEL
Division of Biology, Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif. 91109
Communicated by Jerome Vinograd, October 15, 1973
Vrilogy is a death cult. Beware! Individuals who question the dogma tend to die under mysterious circumstances.
Perhaps you should read Karen Kingston's substack for answers to the proposed questions. We have 5G and aerial spraying at play too. Important to consider environmental variables.
> The theory advanced by Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman that viruses don’t exist
"We actually are not presenting a theory. Because a theory would purport to explain natural phenomena. What we are doing is refuting a theory. We haven't made a claim as to the cause of the disease. But there has been a claim made that there is a virus called SARS-CoV-2... and that [this virus causes] a specific disease.
What we are doing is refuting the evidence put forth to satisfy that claim, because it is extremely faulty and perhaps even fraudulent at some level."
-- Dr Andrew Kaufman, Testimony before the German Corona Committee 4 Feb 2022
Girl, one patent doesn't disprove the theory nor the reality. Nor does a 5 min search into Bill
gate's initiative. That's sheer ignorance and naivety. Geoenginnering is a big topic globally. Question what they are spraying then the impact of it. Please consider researching the subject in depth.